Feeling defeated from the findings from the last post, I
have decided to look at the situation for the Europeans and see what difference
it makes if dietary changes are made to reduce meat consumption. Also, I will
again try to put the findings into context when compared to the overall carbon
emission and other forms of carbon mitigation strategy.
The results from this review of many studies show that the
potential to reduce GHG emissions from food consumption through dietary change
can be substantial in regions with affluent diet. The reduction potential seems
mainly to depend on the amount and type of meat and animal products included in
the diet. Diets in which all animal products (vegan), meat (vegetarian) or
ruminant meat are removed have the lowest GHG emissions. See figure 1. This
confirms the general consensus that going vegan is good. But how effective is
this in reality?
Percentage wise, going vegan in EU has a greater impact on
its overall GHG emission than the US. The review shows that food consumption
accounts for 15-35% of European climate impact whereas in the US it is less than
10%. (This is based on the following figures. The CO2 emissions per capita per
year is around 0.9-1.7 for processes of production and 1.4-3.2 tons if
including transport and retail. According to EEA (2012), each EU citizen is
responsible for 9 tons of CO2 emission every year). If the whole of EU undergoes
dietary change to adopt either vegetarian or vegan diet or even just avoid
eating beef and lamb, there could be a 4-20% reduction in GHG emissions per
capita. This is very exciting and promising indeed!
For example, according to the committee on climate change in
the UK, we have done extremely well so far. Not only has the first carbon
budget target been met, the reduction rate currently also means we may deliver
even more reduction in the second and third phase. However, the projection
shows that we are not on track to meet the fourth, which covers the period
2023-27.
No comments:
Post a Comment